Ease the tension
Source: Trinidad Express Newspapers
Author: Martin Daly
I was in Barbados last week. For five days I was relieved of the need to think about the possibility that someone might try to hold me up or invade the minimally fenced home in which I was staying.
Many readers who travel abroad will be well aware of that feeling of relief and an ease of the tension. On the occasion of a previous visit to Barbados I may have related an interaction with someone at the beach whom I did not know but heard the Trini accent and engaged me in conversation. He volunteered that he was returning home that night and would miss the feeling of freedom he had been enjoying while in Barbados.
The day before arriving in Barbados I had read the conclusion of fellow columnist Joanne Paul that "the suffocating crime atmosphere causes stress, anxiety, fearful vulnerability". She is right, but I am always compelled to ask why so many did not see it coming, or simply wished it away?
As emphasised in these columns, much of the answer lies in the insecurities of a small, complex, post-colonial island society in which the government is predominant in the economy. These two factors of insecurity and government dominance constitute a double whammy.
By misuses and abuses of power (whoever is in power), satellites, sycophants and the supine can be rewarded for fawning collaboration or silence. The rewards are the easy grant of access to undeserved material wealth from the massive State economic sector and appointments to positions of perceived status.
The situation is further complicated by the division of political alignment by race and a consequential lack of a more open-minded discussion of issues. In addition, fear of victimisation or being branded "political" allegedly inhibits the business community and other elites from making statements other than bland or broad ones.
A little over a week ago, on June 7, 2024, I noted with interest yet another statement from the business community on crime. The president of the American Chamber of Commerce (AMCHAM) stated in part as follows: "The business community is willing to assist. We want to assist. All we have to do is be engaged and (be) told what the broad plan is, and how our help will fit into this plan. Fighting crime is the responsibility of the Government. If crime can be solved by the State alone, then great. To date, we have not seen evidence that this is possible. It is time that we put aside our differences and work together with a common goal of putting our beautiful nation first."
Unlike the statements made by the domes and chambers of commerce, of which I have been critical in the past, this one was interesting because a little backbone seemed at last to have been found. The statement was bold enough to place the responsibility of fighting crime on the Government.
This was in contrast to an earlier, somewhat pathetic AMCHAM position that "we're not pointing fingers; however, we're all in this together". Even at that time, then-fellow columnist Andy Johnson described a situation of "citizens, prominent and peasant, at one in a collective sense of fear". (See my column on August 6, 2017 -- "Not pointing fingers".)
Seven disastrous years later, into the now "suffocating crime atmosphere" the vlogger with the handle "Chris Must List" (Chris) arrived and vividly exposed the thriving gang sub-culture that the politicians would prefer we did not see. If the Chris recordings were promoting sedition, then it must mean the acts he recorded were seditious as well.
More importantly, accountability is required of law enforcement regarding its state of knowledge of the areas in which this sub-culture rules. How will law enforcement protect and serve our stressed-out population? How will the Government carry out its responsibility to mitigate the socio-economic conditions which sustain this sub-culture?
As we approach the next general election, perhaps the elites will put aside the flimflam and finally put some more backbone into defining for the Government and Opposition what it sees as a government's responsibility to contain violent crime, particularly as the current Government, constantly in deflection mode, talks about the responsibility of others but not of itself.
-- Martin Daly
